High Court sets aside Income Tax Act order due to natural justice violation, remands for fresh decision.

The High Court of Calcutta allowed the appeal, setting aside the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a violation of principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision, with directions to provide relevant information, grant the assessee time to respond, and allow for a personal hearing before issuing a new order in compliance with the law.

---

---

Issues involved:
The appeal against the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 based on violation of principles of natural justice.

Issue 1: Violation of principles of natural justice

The writ petitioner filed a petition challenging the order passed by the respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing violation of principles of natural justice. The learned Single Bench dismissed the writ petition, stating that all issues can be raised in the re-assessment proceedings. The appellant, aggrieved by this decision, preferred the present appeal.

Issue 2: Error in assessment proceedings

Upon perusing the show cause notice issued by the Assessing Officer under Section 148A(b), it was found that certain allegations were made against the appellant/assessee regarding transactions with specific companies. However, the appellant had responded within the given timeframe and submitted necessary documents. It was noted that no opportunity for a personal hearing was provided to the assessee, and there were discrepancies in the communication and documentation process by the Assessing Officer. This led to a conclusion that there was a violation of principles of natural justice, necessitating a fresh decision.

In conclusion, the High Court of Calcutta allowed the appeal, setting aside the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision. The Assessing Officer was directed to provide all relevant information concerning the companies involved and grant the assessee 15 days to submit a short additional response. Furthermore, an opportunity for a personal hearing was to be provided before a fresh order could be passed on merits and in accordance with the law.

---