TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court dismisses appeals, upholds orders, and disposes pending applications without costs.</h1> <h3>PR. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT), MUMBAI Versus SYNGENTA INDIA LTD.</h3> The SC in 2023 (6) TMI 801 dismissed the appeals, condoned the delay, and upheld the impugned orders. Pending applications were disposed of with no costs. ... Classification of goods - sweet corn or maize? - Scope of Show cause notice (SCN) - it was held by CESTAT that ‘sweet corn’ is not ‘cereal’ for the purposes of exclusion from chapter 12 of the First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975. HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with the orders impugned under these appeals - appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court of India in the case with citation 2023 (6) TMI 801 dismissed the appeals and condoned the delay. The court did not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders. Pending applications were disposed of with no order as to costs. The judges were Mr. Aniruddha Bose and Mr. Vikram Nath.
TaxTMI 
