Appeal allowed as assessment void ab initio due to lack of income escapement The appeal challenged the addition made on account of unexplained cash credit under section 68 for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal ruled in ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal allowed as assessment void ab initio due to lack of income escapement
The appeal challenged the addition made on account of unexplained cash credit under section 68 for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, declaring the assessment void ab initio as the reasons for reopening the case did not indicate income escapement but focused on verifying the source of investment. Consequently, the appeal was allowed based on the invalidity of the assessment order, and the decision was pronounced in Open Court on 14/06/2023.
Issues Involved: The appeal challenges the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for A.Y. 2008-09 regarding addition made on account of unexplained cash credit u/s. 68.
Issue 1: Addition on Account of Unexplained Cash Credit u/s. 68
The assessee deposited Rs. 24,06,100/- with the Bank of India during the Financial Year 2007-08 but declared income of only Rs. 1,31,300/-. The Assessing Officer made additions totaling Rs. 12,90,350/-, including Rs. 10,65,350/- of unconfirmed labor income and Rs. 2,25,000/- of non-genuine transaction. The CIT(A) upheld the additions.
Judgment Details:
The Ld. A.R. challenged the Assessment Order citing that the reasons for reopening the case did not indicate escapement of income but verification of deposit details. Citing the case of PCIT vs. Manzil Dineshkumar Shah, it was argued that the assessment was invalid. The Ld. D.R. supported the assessment and CIT(A) order.
The Tribunal noted that the reasons for reopening focused on verifying the source of investment, not income escapement. Referring to the Manzil Dineshkumar Shah case, it was emphasized that assessments cannot be reopened without valid reasons for income escapement. The Court's ruling highlighted the need for a belief that income has escaped assessment, not just for verification purposes. Consequently, the assessment was deemed void ab initio, and Ground No. 1 was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Since Ground No. 1 was decided in favor of the assessee, Ground No. 2 was not adjudicated upon as it related to the merit of the assessment, which was held void ab initio.
In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee was allowed based on the invalidity of the assessment order.
This Order was pronounced in Open Court on 14/06/2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
