2023 (6) TMI 708 - AT - Customs

Appeal to Modify Anti-Dumping Duty on Aluminium Coils Dismissed

Banco Products India Ltd. Versus The Union of India

Banco Products India Ltd. Versus The Union of India - TMI Issues Involved:1. Appeal for modification of final findings and Customs Notification regarding imposition of anti-dumping duty on 'colour coated aluminium coils'.2. Maintainability of appeal due to non-participation in investigation and proceedings before designated authority.Issue 1: Appeal for modification of anti-dumping dutyIn the case, Banco Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal seeking modification of the final findings and Customs Notification regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty on 'colour coated aluminium coils'. The appeal requested the exclusion of these coils from the duty and a refund of any excess/additional duty collected. The investigation was initiated by the designated authority based on an application by Hindalco Industries Limited under relevant customs laws and rules to determine the dumping of certain flat rolled products of aluminium originating from China PR. The final findings concluded that there was a positive and significant dumping margin for the subject goods, causing material injury to the domestic industry. The Authority recommended the imposition of anti-dumping duty on these imports to offset the dumping and injury suffered by the domestic industry. The Central Government subsequently issued a notification imposing anti-dumping duty, excluding certain products from the scope of subject goods.Issue 2: Maintainability of appealA preliminary objection was raised during the proceedings regarding the maintainability of the appeal due to the appellant's non-participation in the investigation and proceedings before the designated authority. The appellant filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking permission to submit additional documents, citing a similar issue raised in another appeal. The appellant's counsel acknowledged that the issues raised in the present appeal were also addressed in the other appeal, indicating that a decision in favor of the other appellant would benefit the present appellant as well. Consequently, the application was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed.This judgment highlights the process of anti-dumping investigations, the authority's findings, and the implications of non-participation in appeal proceedings. The decision underscores the importance of active participation in such proceedings to maintain the appeal's viability and address relevant issues effectively.