Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could be denied the benefit of the amnesty scheme for a minor shortfall in payment when the amount payable had been verified and intimated by the authority under the scheme.
Analysis: The petition arose from a dispute under an amnesty scheme framed to settle old tax recoveries by waiving interest and penalty on payment of the full principal tax. The petitioner applied under the scheme, withdrew pending appeals, and paid the amount intimated by the respondent officer after verification. The mismatch between the amount originally reflected in the demand notice and the amount mentioned in the application was held to be inadvertent, and the Court emphasised the object of the scheme as expeditious and effective resolution of old disputes rather than a technical defeat of the benefit on a trivial shortfall. The authority having itself intimated the amount payable, the petitioner acted upon that communication and paid accordingly.
Conclusion: The petitioner could not be denied the benefit of the amnesty scheme on the ground of the alleged short payment, and the impugned communication rejecting the application was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A beneficial amnesty scheme meant to resolve old dues must be applied in a manner that advances its object, and a bona fide minor discrepancy in payment does not defeat relief where the assessee has complied with the amount intimated by the competent authority.