Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the customs authorities were bound to implement the appellate order granting the benefit of Notification No. 113/81-Cus. and to release the imported goods in the absence of any stay order.
Analysis: The appellate authority had already allowed the assessee's appeal and directed assessment of the goods by extending the benefit of the exemption notification. No material was placed before the Court to show that any higher forum had stayed that order. In such circumstances, the subordinate customs authorities could not refuse to act on the operative appellate order. The decision also proceeded on the well-settled principle that revenue authorities are bound by appellate orders and must follow them unless their operation is suspended by a competent court. The Court therefore directed compliance with the appellate order and release of the goods on payment of the usual customs duty.
Conclusion: The customs authorities were bound to give effect to the appellate order, and the petitioner was entitled to release of the goods.