Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit of service tax paid on insurance of vehicles, consultancy for installation of a co-generation plant, insurance of plant, machinery, equipment and stock, insurance of gratuity for employees, and subscription fee paid to the National Sugar Federation was admissible as input service credit.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that consultancy received for the co-generation plant was admissible even though the plant was not installed during the relevant period, as the service had been received and tax paid during that period. It further held that manufacture cannot be carried on without plant, machinery and equipment being kept in working condition, and insurance of such assets is one of the means of ensuring their proper functioning. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's explanation on the remaining disputed services and treated them as sufficiently connected with the manufacturing activity.
Conclusion: The disputed CENVAT credit was held admissible and the disallowance was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned order denying credit was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Services having a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity, including consultancy actually received for a planned production-related facility and insurance of essential plant and machinery, qualify for CENVAT credit as input services.