TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Orders Recalculation of Disallowance Under Sec 14A; Affirms Interest Charges u/ss 234 and 244A.</h1> <h3>Smt. Leela Devi Sankhlecha Versus The ITO Ward 3 (4), Jodhpur</h3> Smt. Leela Devi Sankhlecha Versus The ITO Ward 3 (4), Jodhpur - [2024] 109 ITR (Trib) 260 (ITAT [Jodh]) Issues involved:The issues involved in this judgment include challenges to additions and disallowances made under section 143(3)/250 of the Act, applicability of Section 14A, and charging of interest under sections 234B, 234C, 234D, and withdrawal of interest under section 244A.Challenge to additions and disallowances:The appellant challenged the additions and disallowances made in the order under section 143(3)/250 of the Act, arguing that they were bad in law and on facts, and requested for their deletion. The Tribunal noted that the first ground of appeal was a general one and did not require adjudication.Applicability of Section 14A:The appellant contested the application of Section 14A, claiming it was contrary to the law and facts. The CIT(A) had directed the Assessing Officer to rework the disallowance under Rule 8D, as the original calculation was found to be incorrect. The Tribunal found that the AO had not provided an opportunity of being heard to the appellant before arriving at the figures, leading to ambiguity in the calculation. The Tribunal held that the provisions of Section 14A were wrongly applied and directed the deletion of the disallowance made under Section 14A.Charging of interest under sections 234B, 234C, 234D, and withdrawal under section 244A:The appellant denied the liability of charging and withdrawal of interest under the mentioned sections, claiming it was contrary to the law and facts. The Tribunal noted that the charging of interest and withdrawal were mandatory and consequential in nature. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, with directions to rework the disallowance under Section 14A and deletion of the disallowance made under the same section.Separate Judgment:The final decision was pronounced under Rule 34(4) of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, and it was agreed upon by the members of the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
