Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1994 (10) TMI 64 - SC - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Section 25(1) exemption can be rescinded if government withdraws it for public interest; not promissory estoppel The SC held that a time-bound exemption notification issued under Section 25(1) was not an unequivocal promise attracting promissory estoppel and could be ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Section 25(1) exemption can be rescinded if government withdraws it for public interest; not promissory estoppel

                          The SC held that a time-bound exemption notification issued under Section 25(1) was not an unequivocal promise attracting promissory estoppel and could be rescinded when the Government, satisfied that public interest required it, withdrew the exemption before its extended expiry. The Court found the High Court correct that statutory notifications issued in public interest do not create enforceable legal relationships by way of promise, and therefore the appeals challenging the withdrawal were dismissed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Applicability of the doctrine of promissory estoppel against the Government.
                          2. Validity of the withdrawal of exemption notification before its stipulated expiry date.
                          3. Public interest as a justification for modifying or withdrawing an exemption notification.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Applicability of the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Against the Government:

                          The appellants invoked the doctrine of promissory estoppel, arguing that the Central Government could not withdraw the exemption notification before its expiry date, as they had placed orders for the import of PVC resin based on the exemption. The doctrine of promissory estoppel is well-established in administrative law to avoid injustice where a party has made an unequivocal promise or representation intended to create legal relations, which the other party has acted upon. The Supreme Court noted that the doctrine is applicable against the Government to prevent fraud or manifest injustice but cannot compel the Government to carry out a promise contrary to law or outside the authority of the officer making it. The Court emphasized that the doctrine must yield when equity demands, especially if it would be inequitable to hold the Government to its promise considering public interest.

                          2. Validity of the Withdrawal of Exemption Notification Before Its Stipulated Expiry Date:

                          The appellants argued that the Government could not withdraw the exemption notification before the stipulated expiry date of 31st March 1981, as they had placed orders relying on the notification. The Court held that merely mentioning the expiry date does not constitute an unequivocal representation that the notification could not be rescinded or modified before that date if public interest so demanded. The power to grant exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act includes the power to modify or withdraw the same. The Court noted that the exemption notification was issued in public interest and could be withdrawn in public interest if the Government was satisfied that it was necessary to do so.

                          3. Public Interest as a Justification for Modifying or Withdrawing an Exemption Notification:

                          The respondents argued that the exemption had been withdrawn in public interest, and individual interest must give way to public interest. The Court agreed, stating that the power to grant exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act is contingent upon the satisfaction of the Government that it is necessary in public interest. The Court found that the reasons given by the Government for withdrawing the exemption were not irrelevant or insufficient. The exemption was initially granted to equalize prices between indigenous and imported PVC resin, and when international prices fell, making imports cheaper, the exemption was withdrawn to protect indigenous producers. The Court held that the withdrawal of the exemption in public interest was justified and did not constitute a breach of any enforceable promise.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Supreme Court upheld the withdrawal of the exemption notification before its stipulated expiry date, emphasizing that public interest justified the modification. The doctrine of promissory estoppel could not be invoked against the Government in this case, as the exemption notification did not constitute an unequivocal promise, and the withdrawal was in public interest. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's judgment.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found