Supreme Court rules against disallowance of reimbursement, clarifies tax deduction rules

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the disallowance of Rs. 8,65,57,909 for failure to deduct tax at source was unsustainable. The Court clarified that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source for the reimbursement, overturning the Assessing Officer's decision to disallow the amount under section 40(a)(i). The Delhi High Court's initial ruling was upheld, and the disallowance was deleted.

---

---

Issues involved:
The appeal involves the disallowance of reimbursement of mobilization and demobilization expenses of Rs. 8,65,57,909 for the assessment year 2003-04.

Factual background and assessment:
The resident corporate entity, a wholly owned subsidiary of a Netherlands-based company, engaged in dredging and marine activities, filed its return of income declaring a loss. The Assessing Officer disallowed the reimbursement amount. The assessee appealed to the Tribunal.

Tribunal's decision and High Court appeal:
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify if tax was deducted at source. The Revenue appealed to the Delhi High Court, where it was held that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source for the reimbursement. The High Court's decision was challenged by the assessee in the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court decision and reassessment:
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's observations regarding the assessee being treated as an assessee in default. Despite this, the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment and disallowed the reimbursement amount under section 40(a)(i) for failure to deduct tax at source.

Final decision and conclusion:
The Delhi High Court had earlier held that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source for the reimbursement. The Supreme Court's decision further clarified this, leading to the deletion of the disallowance. The disallowance of Rs. 8,65,57,909 under section 40(a)(i) was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed.

Judgment delivery:
The order was pronounced in the open court on 29th May, 2023.

---