Technical verification in customs classification required before deciding disputed tariff heading for imported remotely piloted aircraft.

Classification of imported goods as remotely piloted aircraft could not be decided on a limited examination alone, because their nature, purpose and functional capability required technical verification by approved agencies or competent experts. The original record was found insufficient for final classification, so fresh adjudication was necessary. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the original authority for reconsideration after technical certification and a personal hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the classification dispute concerning the imported goods required fresh fact finding by the original authority and consequential remand.

Analysis: The appeal involved a dispute whether the goods were correctly treated as remotely piloted aircraft and classified under the disputed tariff heading, or whether the appellant's claim required further technical verification. The record showed that the departmental authorities proceeded on the basis of examination by the Shed Officer without a detailed technical assessment. Since the nature, purpose, and functional capability of the goods were central to the classification dispute, the matter required examination by approved agencies or competent technical experts. The appellant was also entitled to an effective opportunity of hearing before the issue was decided afresh.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication after technical certification and personal hearing.

---