Anticipatory bail refused where prima facie forgery and GST fraud allegations made custodial interrogation necessary.

In anticipatory bail matters, a prima facie case and the seriousness of the allegations remain the primary considerations, and the mere absence of a custodial interrogation requirement does not by itself justify relief. On the facts stated, the accused was linked to alleged forgery, fake documents, fictitious firms, forged rent deeds, misuse of identity documents and fraudulent GST activity, with recoveries still required and the real beneficiaries not yet identified. The HC therefore treated custodial interrogation as necessary to uncover the wider role of the accused and recover relevant material, and declined pre-arrest protection.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged forgery, use of fake documents and fraudulent GST registrations, having regard to the prima facie material against him and the need for custodial interrogation.

Analysis: The petition was considered in the light of the settled principle that the absence of a requirement for custodial interrogation, by itself, does not justify grant of anticipatory bail. The decisive consideration is the existence of a prima facie case, along with the nature and seriousness of the ations and the need to unearth the role of the accused and recover relevant material. On the materials placed, the petitioner was alleged to have been part of a larger conspiracy involving fictitious firms, forged rent deeds, misuse of identity documents and fraudulent GST-related activity causing substantial loss to the State. The record also indicated that recoveries were required and the real beneficiaries were yet to be identified.

Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was declined because a prima facie case was made out and custodial interrogation was found necessary.

Final Conclusion: The petition did not merit discretionary relief, and the accused was not granted pre-arrest protection.

Ratio Decidendi: In an application for anticipatory bail, the existence of a prima facie case and the seriousness of the alleged offence are primary considerations, and the absence of custodial interrogation alone is not sufficient to grant relief.

---