Insolvency dissolution upheld where no viable resolution plan emerged and creditors' unanimous commercial decision found no legal infirmity.

Dissolution of the corporate debtor under Section 54 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was sustained because no realisable assets remained, no viable resolution plan emerged within the insolvency timeline, and the only valuable asset had lost utility. The Committee of Creditors approved dissolution unanimously, and the appellate tribunal found no legal infirmity in the adjudicating authority's order. Reaffirming that insolvency proceedings are time-bound and that the commercial decision of the Committee of Creditors will not be interfered with unless arbitrary or contrary to statute, the tribunal upheld the dissolution order and dismissed the appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order dissolving the corporate debtor under Section 54 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was sustainable and whether the appellate tribunal should interfere with the Committee of Creditors' decision approving dissolution.

Analysis: The corporate debtor had no realisable assets, no viable resolution plan had materialised within the prescribed insolvency timeline, and the sole valuable asset had already lost utility. The Committee of Creditors approved dissolution with 100% voting, and the resolution professional sought dissolution accordingly. The appellate challenge did not disclose any legal infirmity in the order of the adjudicating authority. The tribunal also reiterated that insolvency proceedings are time-bound and that the commercial decision of the Committee of Creditors is not to be disturbed unless it is shown to be arbitrary or contrary to statute.

Conclusion: The dissolution order was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.

---