Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a classification and price list earlier accepted by the Department, though found to be erroneous, could justify recovery of differential duty retrospectively from the date of the original price list or only prospectively from the date of the show-cause notice.
Analysis: The accepted price list was acted upon by the Department and the goods were cleared with departmental knowledge. In the absence of any amendment in law or intervening judicial pronouncement, the earlier acceptance could not be reopened so as to fasten liability retrospectively. Although the Department had power to issue a notice where duty had been short-levied due to erroneous application of law, the reassessment of liability could operate only from the date on which the Department chose to issue the notice.
Conclusion: The reclassification and revised duty demand were held effective only from the date of the show-cause notice, and not from the date of the original price list; the appeal was accordingly partly in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Prior departmental acceptance of a price list does not bar a lawful notice for short levy, but any corrected duty liability based on the later view of classification operates prospectively from the notice date in the absence of a change in law or binding judicial ruling.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Department has accepted and acted upon a price list with full knowledge of the clearances, a later correction in classification or valuation, absent a change in law or judicial pronouncement, can be given effect only prospectively from the date of the show-cause notice.