Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail in proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in view of the statutory restrictions under Section 45 and the material collected during investigation.
Analysis: The petition was considered on the basis that bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is subject to the twin conditions in Section 45, namely opportunity to oppose the application and the Court's satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. The Court noted that the petitioner had cooperated with the investigating agency, that no charge sheet had been filed in the predicate offence, that no incriminating material or money trail directly linking the petitioner had been shown with certainty, and that the petitioner had already been in custody. The Court also considered the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the effect of continued incarceration in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The statutory conditions for refusal of bail were not found to justify further detention, and bail was granted to the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: For bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the Court must assess the material on broad probabilities to see whether the twin conditions in Section 45 are satisfied, and continued custody is unwarranted where the available material does not sufficiently establish the accused's culpability and the accused has cooperated with investigation.