Tribunal Overturns Penalties for Transporter in Central Excise Case

The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on the transporter under Rule 26(2)(ii) of Central Excise Rules, 2002, as there was no evidence of contravention of the rules by the transporter. The Commissioner's finding that the transporter breached trust was not supported by specific evidence of wrongdoing beyond normal business practices. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the transporter, concluding that the penalties were unjustified.

---

---

Issues involved: Imposition of penalties on the transporter under Rule 26(2)(ii) of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

Summary:

Issue 1: Imposition of penalties on the transporter under Rule 26(2)(ii) of Central Excise Rules, 2002

The appeals were directed against Order-in-Original No. 05/CEX/2012 and Order-in-Original No. 06/CEX/2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik, imposing penalties on the transporter. The Commissioner found that the transporter allowed a broker to take possession of the material instead of delivering it to the designated places, which was a serious breach of trust and deviation from the normal course of business. The transporter defended themselves by claiming they acted at the behest of the broker and were not concerned about the invoices or material. However, the Tribunal observed that the impugned orders did not specify any contravention of the Central Excise Rules by the transporter. It was noted that there was no evidence to suggest that the transporter acted beyond normal business practices in transporting the goods. Consequently, the Tribunal found no merit in the imposition of penalties on the transporter and set them aside, allowing the appeals in favor of the transporter.

(Order pronounced in the open court)

---