Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cost of packing in gunny bags was excludable from the assessable value under Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and whether the assessee was entitled to refund of the duty collected on that basis.
Analysis: The exclusion under Section 4(4)(d)(i) applies where the packing is of durable nature and is returnable by the buyer to the assessee. The evidence showed a controlled commodity regime in which the price of cement and the packing charges were separately fixed, and the governing orders required serviceable empty bags to be preserved and returned to the factory or its collecting agent on payment. On that basis, the arrangement between seller and buyer made the gunny bags returnable within the meaning of the provision. Actual return of each bag was not required; the relevant test was the existence of a return arrangement, not proof of physical return in fact. The cost of such packing therefore could not be included in the assessable value, and the demand raised on that footing was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The cost of gunny bag packing was not includable in the assessable value, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the duty paid under protest with respect to the excess collection, subject to verification.