Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds Financial Creditor's Section 7 application, dismissing challenge on maintainability and affirming right to issue Acceleration Notice.

        Mr. Mayur Suchak Suspended Promoter & Director of Renaissance Indus Infra Pvt. Ltd. Versus Catalyst Trusteeship Limited, Renaissance Indus Infra Pvt. Ltd.

        Mr. Mayur Suchak Suspended Promoter & Director of Renaissance Indus Infra Pvt. Ltd. Versus Catalyst Trusteeship Limited, Renaissance Indus Infra Pvt. Ltd. ... Issues Involved:
        1. Maintainability of Section 7 Application by Financial Creditor.
        2. Locus Standi of Financial Creditor to Issue Acceleration Notice.
        3. Admissibility of Debt and Default by Corporate Debtor.
        4. Compliance with Debenture Trustee Document and Inter-Creditor Agreement.

        Summary:

        Issue 1: Maintainability of Section 7 Application by Financial Creditor
        The Appellant challenged the maintainability of the Section 7 application filed by Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd., arguing that only the Debenture Trustee, Vistra ITCL, was entitled to initiate proceedings against the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority admitted the Section 7 application, leading to the present appeal.

        Issue 2: Locus Standi of Financial Creditor to Issue Acceleration Notice
        The Appellant contended that Respondent No.1 lacked the locus to issue the Acceleration Notice dated 26.07.2022, asserting that only the Debenture Trustee could act in the event of default. However, the Tribunal found that the Financial Creditor was fully entitled to issue the Acceleration Notice as per Clause 9.8 of the Debenture Trustee Document, which allows the lender to take all actions and seek remedies available under applicable laws. The Debenture Trustee had already issued a Demand Notice on 13.07.2022, making the Corporate Debtor liable to comply.

        Issue 3: Admissibility of Debt and Default by Corporate Debtor
        The Corporate Debtor did not dispute the debt and default in its reply before the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal noted that the Corporate Debtor admitted the debt and default, citing business standstill due to COVID-19. The Tribunal concluded that the debt and default were undisputed and clearly proved.

        Issue 4: Compliance with Debenture Trustee Document and Inter-Creditor Agreement
        The Tribunal examined clauses from the Debenture Trustee Document and the Inter-Creditor Agreement. It concluded that the Financial Creditor had the right to issue the Acceleration Notice and initiate proceedings under Section 7. The Tribunal highlighted that the Financial Creditor had stepped into the shoes of the Debenture Holder based on the Assignment Deed dated 04.03.2021.

        In conclusion, the Tribunal found no merit in the Appellant's arguments and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's order admitting the Section 7 application.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found