TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Assessment Dispute Resolved: Resort's GST Compliance Scrutinized, Penalties Substantially Reduced After Detailed Review</h1> <h3>M/s Jalsa Resorts Thru. Director Rajendra Singh And Another Versus State Of U.P. Tax Deptt. Thru. Prin. Secy. Govt. U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others</h3> M/s Jalsa Resorts Thru. Director Rajendra Singh And Another Versus State Of U.P. Tax Deptt. Thru. Prin. Secy. Govt. U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others - ... Issues involved:The judgment involves the assessment of tax, penalty, and interest under the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on a resort for non-compliance with tax regulations and discrepancies in the reported turnover.Details of the judgment:Issue 1: Assessment of tax, penalty, and interestThe petitioner, a resort, was issued a notice under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for non-compliance with tax regulations. The Assessing Authority, through an ex-parte order, assessed a total amount of Rs. 48,96,000/-, comprising Central G.S.T., State G.S.T., penalty, and interest, based on a turnover of one crore. The petitioner challenged this order through an appeal.Issue 2: Appellate review and findingsThe Appellate Authority examined the documents submitted by the petitioner, including returns for the financial year 2017-18, and documents recovered by the Special Investigation Branch. The diary entries recovered indicated discrepancies in the advance amounts received by the petitioner compared to what was reported. The Appellate Authority reduced the assessed amount to Rs. 10,39,320/-, significantly lower than the initial assessment.Issue 3: Judicial decisionThe Court found no error in the Appellate Authority's order, rejecting the petitioner's claim that the assessment was based on presumption. The Court noted that the Appellate Authority thoroughly reviewed all documents and evidence before making its decision. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed for lacking merit and substance.
TaxTMI 