Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on the additional tax demand raised in revisional proceedings under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was leviable from the date of filing of the return or only from the date of the revisional order.
Analysis: The liability under Section 14(6) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 attaches where a dealer fails to pay tax in accordance with the Act and the rules. The Court distinguished authorities dealing with the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 and held them inapplicable to the self-assessment scheme under the HVAT Act. It accepted that where tax ought to have been paid along with the return, non-payment attracts statutory interest from the date the tax was required to be deposited, even if the exact liability is later modified in revision. The decision in Faridabad Fabricators was treated as directly applicable.
Conclusion: Interest on the additional demand was leviable from the date of filing the return, not from the date of the revisional order, and the assessee's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under a self-assessment regime, statutory interest for failure to pay tax in accordance with the Act runs from the original due date for payment, and a later revisional enhancement of demand does not postpone the accrual of interest.