Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2023 (5) TMI 754 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeals on CENVAT credit denial for township services, emphasizes comprehensive nexus assessment. The tribunal allowed the appeals challenging the denial of CENVAT credit for services used in townships. It held that the denial was improper as the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal allows appeals on CENVAT credit denial for township services, emphasizes comprehensive nexus assessment.

                            The tribunal allowed the appeals challenging the denial of CENVAT credit for services used in townships. It held that the denial was improper as the original authority failed to adequately consider the entire definition of 'input service' under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal emphasized that the nexus between the services and the final output should be assessed comprehensively, not solely based on proximity to the manufacturing activity. The case was remanded to the original authority for a reassessment of the services' direct or indirect use and their connection to the final output.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Denial of CENVAT credit on services deployed in townships.
                            2. Conformity with the definition of 'input service' under rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
                            3. Nexus between impugned services and manufacturing activities.
                            4. Applicability of judicial decisions to the dispute.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Denial of CENVAT Credit on Services Deployed in Townships:
                            The appeals challenge the denial of CENVAT credit for tax paid on services such as 'construction service', 'security service', 'maintenance and repair service', 'works contract service', and 'manpower recruitment and supply service' used in townships. The central excise authorities argued that these services do not conform to the definition of 'input service' under rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The original authority disallowed the credit, stating that the services were used in residential quarters and other civil structures located away from the factory, which do not have a nexus with the manufacturing activity.

                            2. Conformity with the Definition of 'Input Service' under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:
                            The original authority emphasized that the services in question are not covered under the main definition of 'input service' and are not included in the extended definition, which specifically includes services used for setting up buildings linked to manufacturing, storage, and sale of final products. Consequently, services for construction and maintenance of townships for employees were deemed welfare measures without a nexus to the manufacture, storage, or sale of final products.

                            3. Nexus Between Impugned Services and Manufacturing Activities:
                            The appellant cited the decision in Coca Cola India Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III, arguing that the principle of entitlement flows from the inclusion of costs in production. Conversely, the respondent relied on the decision in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Manikgarh Cement, which held that establishing a residential colony for employees is a welfare activity not integrally connected to the business of manufacturing and thus does not qualify as an 'input service'.

                            4. Applicability of Judicial Decisions to the Dispute:
                            The tribunal examined several judgments, including the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay's decisions in Coca Cola India Pvt Ltd and Manikgarh Cement. In Coca Cola India Pvt Ltd, the court allowed credit for advertisement services as they were deemed to have an effect on the manufacture of the final product. However, in Manikgarh Cement, the court held that services rendered in residential colonies do not qualify as 'input services' due to the lack of nexus with the business activity.

                            Conclusion and Remand:
                            The tribunal concluded that the perception of 'nexus' should not be the sole determinant for eligibility under rule 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Instead, conformity must be tested against the entire definition of 'input service' in rule 2(l). The original authority's order lacked a detailed examination of the principal leg of the definition and its relevance to the final output. Therefore, the tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the proceedings to the original authority to reassess the direct or indirect use of the impugned services and their nexus with the final output. The appeals were allowed by way of remand.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found