Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether disability pension arrears received by a disabled armed forces officer remained exempt from income tax under the CBDT circular dated 02.07.2001 notwithstanding the later circular dated 24.06.2019, and (ii) whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of tax already recovered, with interest and costs.
Issue (i): whether disability pension arrears received by a disabled armed forces officer remained exempt from income tax under the CBDT circular dated 02.07.2001 notwithstanding the later circular dated 24.06.2019
Analysis: The exemption circular of 02.07.2001 reiterated that the entire disability pension, including both the disability element and the service element, continued to be exempt from income tax. The later circular dated 24.06.2019 was under challenge before the Supreme Court, which directed the parties to maintain status quo. The petitioner's entitlement was also supported by earlier High Court decisions applying the exemption to similarly situated disabled armed forces personnel. In these circumstances, the later circular could not be applied to deny the benefit claimed by the petitioner.
Conclusion: The disability pension received by the petitioner remained exempt, and the objection based on the later circular could not defeat the claim.
Issue (ii): whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of tax already recovered, with interest and costs
Analysis: Once the pension income was held exempt, the tax recovered on the relevant years could not be retained. The Court accepted the petitioner's claim for refund, and also granted consequential interest and costs, with an additional higher rate of interest if payment was delayed beyond the stipulated period.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to refund of the tax recovered along with interest and costs.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the impugned rejection of refund was set aside, resulting in consequential monetary relief in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: Disability pension exempted by the CBDT circular dated 02.07.2001 cannot be denied by a later circular that is itself under challenge and subject to a status quo order, and tax recovered on such exempt income is refundable with consequential interest.