Tribunal reduces unexplained cash deposit, accepts medical treatment explanation

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the assessee, reducing the unexplained cash deposit amount from Rs.15,41,000 to Rs.4,81,000. The Tribunal accepted the explanation provided by the assessee's representative regarding the source of funds related to medical treatment, considering the individual's status as a housewife. The decision reflected a balance between the circumstances of the case and the evidence presented, granting partial relief to the assessee in the assessment for the year 2017-18.

---

---

Issues involved:
The judgment concerns an appeal by the assessee against the addition of Rs.15,41,000 for unexplained cash deposit in a bank account during the demonetization period for the assessment year 2017-18.

Details of the judgment:

1. Issue of unexplained cash deposit:
The primary issue in the case was the addition of Rs.15,41,000 for an unexplained cash deposit in the bank account during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer treated the cash deposit as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Act. The assessee, a housewife, failed to file a return of income for the relevant assessment year. The CIT(Appeals) confirmed the addition, leading to the appeal before the Tribunal.

2. Arguments and submissions:
The assessee's representative argued that the cash deposit was from past savings kept for the medical treatment of her cancer patient husband. The representative cited previous decisions and documents supporting the source of the funds. The Departmental Representative contended that the withdrawals made after the deposits were suspicious and lacked explanation.

3. Tribunal's findings:
The Tribunal examined the bank statements and noted the pattern of deposits and withdrawals during the demonetization period. It observed that certain withdrawals were made immediately after significant deposits, raising suspicions. The Tribunal found the arguments based on previous decisions cited by the assessee's representative to be inapplicable to the current case due to differing facts.

4. Decision and conclusion:
The Tribunal gave the benefit of the doubt to the assessee regarding a specific cash deposit and accepted the explanation for a portion of the amount deposited. It considered the assessee's status as a housewife and her savings for her husband's medical treatment. Ultimately, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, reducing the unexplained cash deposit amount to Rs.4,81,000.

5. Conclusion of the judgment:
In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, considering the circumstances and explanations provided regarding the unexplained cash deposit during the demonetization period.

---