Overseas ad film production services were not fees for technical services, so no withholding tax or disallowance applied.

Payments to non-resident service providers for overseas ad film production and related logistics were treated as business income, not fees for technical services, because the services were commercial and contract-based rather than managerial, technical or consultancy services. As the non-residents had no permanent establishment in India and the services were rendered and utilised outside India, the receipts were not chargeable to tax in India. No obligation to withhold tax arose, and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether payments made to non-resident service providers for ad film production line services and director fees were fees for technical services chargeable to tax in India, so as to attract withholding tax and disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).

Analysis: The payments were for logistics and production-related services such as arranging shooting locations, permits, transport, equipment, visas and similar support outside India. These services were held to be commercial or contract work, not managerial, technical or consultancy services within the statutory definition of fees for technical services. The non-residents had no permanent establishment in India, the services were rendered and utilised outside India, and the receipts were therefore treated as business income not chargeable to tax in India. On that basis, no obligation to withhold tax arose and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could not be sustained.

Conclusion: The payments were not chargeable to tax in India and no disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source was warranted.

Ratio Decidendi: Payments for overseas ad film production and allied logistical services, absent a permanent establishment in India, are not fees for technical services but business income not chargeable to tax in India.

---