Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notional interest on advances received from customers was includible in the assessable value of the goods for central excise duty.
Analysis: The dispute turned on valuation of tailor-made goods supplied against advances. The relevant principle applied was that notional interest on advances can be added to assessable value only if the department establishes that the advances had a nexus with the sale price and that the price charged to buyers was depressed because of such advances. On the material before it, the Court found no evidence that the advances had earned interest or that the price of the goods was influenced downward on account of the advances. In the absence of proof of such nexus and price depression, mere receipt of advances could not justify loading notional interest into value.
Conclusion: The addition of notional interest to the assessable value was not sustainable and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The demand, penalty, and consequential duty adjustment based on inclusion of notional interest on advances could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Notional interest on customer advances is includible in assessable value only when the revenue proves a nexus between the advances and the sale price and shows that the price of the goods was depressed because of the advances.