Customs house agent licence renewal: original grant conditions cannot be imported, and only one renewal is permitted under the scheme.

Under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984, renewal of a regular licence is distinct from the original grant process, so the Collector cannot import the initial eligibility conditions or Public Notice norms into renewal as a matter of course. Renewal may be declined only on relevant grounds such as pending proceedings, suspension, breach of obligations, or other indicators of unfitness. The text also states that Regulation 12 permits renewal of the same regular licence for one further three-year period only, and does not contemplate repeated renewals unless the statute clearly says so.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether, while renewing a customs house agent's regular licence under the 1984 Regulations, the Collector can insist upon compliance with the conditions prescribed for grant of the original licence and in Public Notice No. 307/85; (ii) whether a second renewal of such regular licence is permissible.

Issue (i): Whether, while renewing a customs house agent's regular licence under the 1984 Regulations, the Collector can insist upon compliance with the conditions prescribed for grant of the original licence and in Public Notice No. 307/85.

Analysis: The renewal power under Regulation 12 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 is distinct from the initial grant mechanism under Regulations 6, 8, 9 and 10. A regular licence is first obtained only after the applicant satisfies the stringent requirements for a temporary licence and passes the prescribed examination. Once that stage is crossed, Regulation 12 provides only that the licence shall remain valid for three years and may be renewed for a further period of three years. The wording does not incorporate the original eligibility conditions for renewal. The discretion conferred by the word "may" is not arbitrary, but it cannot be exercised by importing conditions meant for the original grant of licence, particularly when the 1984 Regulations deliberately departed from the earlier 1965 scheme. Renewal may be refused in appropriate cases where there are pending proceedings, suspension, breach of obligations, or other circumstances showing unfitness, but not by insisting on the original grant norms as a matter of course.

Conclusion: The insistence on the original grant conditions and the Public Notice norms for renewal was not justified; this issue is answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Issue (ii): Whether a second renewal of such regular licence is permissible.

Analysis: Regulation 12(1) states that a licence granted under Regulation 10 shall be valid for three years, and Regulation 12(2) permits renewal of "the same" licence for a further period of three years. The phrase refers back to the original regular licence granted under Regulation 10 and does not contemplate repeated renewals. Read with the change in scheme from the 1965 Regulations, the provision permits only one renewal of the regular licence. In the facts of the case, the licence had already been renewed twice, taking the period beyond six years, which was inconsistent with Regulation 12.

Conclusion: A second renewal was impermissible; this issue is answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeds, the writ order is set aside, and the refusal to renew the licence is upheld, while leaving it open to seek a fresh licence in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory renewal provision permits renewal of a licence for a further specified period and does not expressly import the original grant conditions, the authority cannot insist on those original conditions at renewal, and a renewal clause using the expression "the same" ordinarily contemplates only one renewal unless the statute clearly provides otherwise.

---