TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Allows Assessee to Rectify Filing Errors in Appeal Process, Emphasizes Fair Opportunity to Present Case.</h1> <h3>Sumita Singh Versus ITO, Ward-2 (2), Dhanbad</h3> Sumita Singh Versus ITO, Ward-2 (2), Dhanbad - TMI Issues involved: Appeal against orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, discrepancy in filing appeal form, opportunity for assessee to present case before CIT(A).Summary:Issue 1: Estimation of agriculture incomeThe assessee appealed against the Assessing Officer's estimation of agriculture income at Rs.50,000 instead of Rs.5,65,450, resulting in the remaining amount being assessed as income from other sources.Issue 2: Ex parte order by CIT(A)The assessee's counsel argued that the CIT(A)'s order was ex parte and based on a mistake in filing the appeal against a rectification order u/s 154 instead of the original order u/s 143(3). The counsel requested an opportunity for the assessee to rectify the mistake and present the case before the CIT(A).Judgment:The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to allow the assessee to rectify the mistake in filing Form no.35 and present necessary documents to properly address the appeal against the original assessment order u/s 143(3). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of giving the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard and decided in accordance with the law. The same directions were applied to all related appeals with identical facts and issues.In conclusion, all appeals of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes, ensuring that the assessee receives a fair chance to present their case before the CIT(A) and rectify any filing discrepancies.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
