Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner could be denied the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 because the amount payable under Form SVLDRS-3 could not be finally remitted owing to expiry of the challan, after an earlier RTGS payment had been accepted and then reversed.
Analysis: The petitioner's eligibility under the scheme and issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 were not in dispute. The material question was whether a bona fide attempt to pay within time, followed by failure caused by expiry of the challan and reversal of the amount for no fault of the petitioner, could defeat the scheme benefit. The Court applied the principle that a person should not be made to suffer for something impossible or beyond control, and relied on earlier decisions granting relief in comparable situations under the same scheme. The Court held that the object of the scheme would be undermined if a technical failure, not attributable to the petitioner, were treated as a bar to settlement.
Conclusion: The petitioner could not be denied the benefit of the scheme on the ground of expiry of the challan, and the authorities were required to permit payment of the settlement amount and thereafter issue the discharge certificate.