Cable operator receipts held taxable on gross value, while penalties were dropped due to bona fide belief.

Cable operator service receipts for pay channels were held liable to service tax on the gross amounts collected, because the departmental clarification cited by the assessee concerned broadcasting services and did not exclude part of the receipts from the taxable value. The taxable amount was required to be recalculated on a cum-tax basis. Penalties were not sustained, as the assessee's bona fide belief that tax was not payable on pay-channel collections made penal action unwarranted, though statutory interest remained payable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amounts collected by a cable operator towards pay channels formed part of the taxable value liable to service tax for the relevant period; (ii) Whether the penalties imposed under the service tax provisions were sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether the amounts collected by a cable operator towards pay channels formed part of the taxable value liable to service tax for the relevant period.

Analysis: The clarification relied on by the appellant dealt with the scope of broadcasting services and not with cable operator services. The service rendered by the appellant was cable operator service, which was taxable from 2002, and the gross amount collected from subscribers could not be split into taxable and non-taxable components. The receipts were therefore liable to service tax, and the liability was not negated by the departmental clarification.

Conclusion: The service tax liability was upheld, and the amount was required to be recalculated in accordance with the cum-tax principle accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals).

Issue (ii): Whether the penalties imposed under the service tax provisions were sustainable.

Analysis: The appellant entertained a bona fide belief that service tax was not payable on the amount collected towards pay channels. In the circumstances, the imposition of penalties was considered unwarranted, though interest remained payable according to law.

Conclusion: The penalties were set aside.

Final Conclusion: The demand on taxability was sustained with recalculation of the taxable value, but the penal consequences were annulled, leaving the assessee liable only to the tax and statutory interest.

Ratio Decidendi: Cable operator services were taxable on the gross receipts for the relevant period, and a departmental clarification concerning broadcasting services could not be used to exclude part of those receipts from service tax; penalties may be waived where the assessee acted under a bona fide belief.

---