Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The assessee argued that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act instead of section 153A, as the satisfaction note was prepared on 29/01/2014, which became the "substituted" date of search under section 153C. The assessment year 2013-14 fell within the six preceding assessment years (2008-09 to 2013-14) for the purpose of assessment under section 153A. The Tribunal referenced its decision in the assessee's own case for AY 2012-13, where it was held that the assessment order passed under section 143(3) was quashed. The Tribunal reiterated that the six assessment years should be considered from the date of recording satisfaction under section 153C. Since the AO did not issue a notice under section 153C, the assessment order under section 143(3) was deemed illegal and unsustainable. Consequently, the orders of the AO and CIT(A) were set aside, and the assessment order was quashed.
Issue 2: Disallowance of 10% of Foreign Travel ExpensesThe assessee contested the estimated disallowance of Rs. 16,42,500/- (10% of foreign travel expenses of directors), arguing that no incriminating material was recovered during the search. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, stating that a personal element could not be ruled out. The Tribunal, however, did not need to address the merits of this issue as the assessment order itself was quashed on legal grounds, rendering the disallowance moot.
Conclusion:The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the assessment order passed under section 143(3) was quashed. Consequently, all additions, including the disallowance of foreign travel expenses, were deleted.