Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to extension of time to deposit the discounted tax amount under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme), 2019.
Analysis: The relief sought required relaxation of the scheme's stipulated time limit for deposit. The scheme was treated as a complete code, and the governing principle applied was that concessions, rebates, and exemption-like benefits in tax matters must be construed strictly. The Court relied on the rule that a person seeking the benefit of such a scheme must satisfy its conditions scrupulously, and that any ambiguity in an exemption or concession provision is to operate against the claimant and in favour of the Revenue. Since extension of the prescribed period would alter the scheme itself, the requested relief could not be granted.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to extension of time for deposit under the scheme, and the challenge failed.