TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessment orders under section 153A were barred by limitation under section 153B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether additions made in the search assessments could survive in the absence of incriminating material found during search.
Issue (i): Whether the assessment orders under section 153A were barred by limitation under section 153B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The time for completing search assessments stood extended only by the period contemplated in Explanation (viii) to section 153B. The reference for exchange of information was made after the relevant amendment had taken effect, so the extended exclusion period applied. Even after giving effect to the exclusion and the minimum-time proviso, the assessment orders were passed beyond the last permissible date.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were time-barred and invalid in law, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether additions made in the search assessments could survive in the absence of incriminating material found during search.
Analysis: The assessment was not shown to rest on any seized incriminating material. The relied-upon HSBC-related papers were not established as authenticated evidence found during search, and the addition was founded on uncorroborated information and a statement under section 132(4), which by itself could not sustain the addition after retraction and in the absence of supporting material. The settled principle applied was that completed assessments under section 153A can be interfered with only on the basis of incriminating material found during search.
Conclusion: The addition was unsustainable and rightly deleted, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals failed, and the assessee's cross objections were dismissed as infructuous because the assessments themselves stood quashed as time-barred.
Ratio Decidendi: In a search assessment under section 153A, completed assessments can be disturbed only on the basis of incriminating material found during search, and the assessment must also be completed within the limitation prescribed by section 153B as extended only in accordance with the statute.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
