GST Registration Restored: Petitioner Granted Relief with Compliance Requirements Under Precedent-Based Conditions

HC allowed the writ petition challenging GST registration certificate cancellation. Based on precedent in Tvl. Suguna Cutpiece case, the court provided relief to the petitioner by permitting restoration of registration subject to specific compliance conditions, including filing pending returns, paying defaulted tax with interest, and adhering to input tax credit restrictions. No additional costs were imposed on the petitioner.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to cancellation of Registration Certificate due to failure to file Goods and Services Tax monthly returns for six months.

Analysis:
The Writ Petition challenges the cancellation of the Registration Certificate based on the Petitioner's failure to file Goods and Services Tax monthly returns for a continuous period of six months. The cancellation was effected under Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, with an effective date of 10.01.2022. The Petitioner cited health issues as the reason for not filing the returns and mentioned receiving a show cause notice on 30.12.2021, followed by the cancellation order on 10.01.2022. The Petitioner could not file an application for revocation in time, leading to the current challenge.

Both counsels for the Petitioner and Respondent referred to a previous judgment by the Court in the case of Tvl. Suguna Cutpiece, where specific directions were issued in similar circumstances. These directions included requirements for filing returns, payment of defaulted tax with interest, restrictions on utilizing Input Tax Credit, scrutiny of Input Tax Credit utilization, payment of GST in cash for subsequent periods, and necessary changes in the GST Web portal architecture. The Court noted that the Revenue/Department had not appealed against this judgment in other cases, indicating acceptance of the Court's view.

Given the consistent application of the directions from the Tvl. Suguna Cutpiece case in subsequent judgments, the Court decided to extend the same benefit to the current Petitioner. The Court ordered the Writ Petition to be resolved based on the terms outlined in the earlier judgment, without imposing any costs on the Petitioner. The decision reflects the Court's adherence to established precedent and the principles laid down in previous cases related to GST registration cancellation and revocation processes.

---