1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court Bombay Quashes Tribunal Order Requiring Pre-Deposit, Cites Lack of Reasons</h1> The High Court Bombay quashed a Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal order requiring a petitioner to pre-deposit 50% of the penalty, ... Tribunal directed the assessee to pre-deposit 50% of the penalty amount β tribunal has not given any reasons in support of the conclusion recorded in the impugned order - Non-recording of reasons itself is a breach of principles of natural justice - impugned order is unsustainable -matter be remanded back to the Tribunal for consideration afresh following principles of natural justice The High Court Bombay quashed and set aside an order by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal directing a petitioner to pre-deposit 50% of the penalty amount. The court found the order unsustainable due to lack of reasons, breaching principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for reconsideration.