TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal affirms classification of 'Aluminum Composite Plates' under CTH 76061190, upholds declared value.</h1> <h3>C.C. -Ahmedabad Versus Chandan Exports</h3> C.C. -Ahmedabad Versus Chandan Exports - TMI Issues Involved:1. Classification of Imported Goods2. Valuation of Imported GoodsSummary:1. Classification of Imported Goods:The primary dispute pertains to the classification of the imported goods, specifically 'Aluminum Composite Plates'. The Revenue classified the goods under CTH 76109090, while the respondent classified them under CTH 76061190. The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the classification under CTH 76061190, noting that this heading covers 'aluminium plates, sheets, and strips of a thickness exceeding 0.2 mm.' The Revenue argued that the goods are 'composite material' and should be classified under CTH 7610, which covers 'aluminium structures and parts of structures.' However, the Tribunal found that the imported goods were not 'prepared for use in structures' and thus fall under CTH 76061190, as they are not structural elements but materials used in making such elements.2. Valuation of Imported Goods:Regarding the valuation, the Revenue contended that the enhancement of value in the Order-In-Original (OIO) was in accordance with the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, citing a previous import assessed at a higher value. The respondent argued that the earlier assessment was not contested to expedite clearance. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner correctly held there were no reasons to reject the declared price and that the Revenue did not follow the proper procedure for rejecting the declared value under Rule 12 before revaluation. The Tribunal upheld the declared value, referencing the case of Modern Manufacturers, which held that enhancement based on NIDB data without rejecting the declared value is improper.Conclusion:The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the impugned order, sustaining the classification under CTH 76061190 and accepting the declared value. The appeal filed by the Department was dismissed.
TaxTMI 