TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Reassessment Under Income Tax Act. Lack of Evidence Leads to Disallowed Expenses & Added Liabilities.</h1> <h3>M/s CGA Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Bathinda</h3> M/s CGA Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1 Bathinda - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of reassessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act.2. Classification of gross receipts as income from other sources versus agricultural income.3. Allowance of expenses incurred by the assessee.4. Addition of unexplained share capital, share premium, and current liabilities.5. Rebate on liability created by SEBI.Summary:Issue 1: Validity of Reassessment under Section 148The assessee challenged the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding the reassessment under section 148. The AO reopened the case based on information from a reliable source, conducted verification, and obtained prior approval from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Bathinda. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the recorded reason and upheld the AO's jurisdiction. The ground was dismissed.Issue 2: Classification of Gross ReceiptsThe AO added the gross receipts of Rs. 39,03,62,282/- as income from other sources, not agricultural income, due to the assessee's failure to prove the genuineness of the agricultural income and lack of evidence of agricultural land holding. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, and the Tribunal found no infirmity in the order. The grounds were dismissed.Issue 3: Allowance of ExpensesThe assessee claimed expenses amounting to Rs. 16,90,96,294/- but failed to provide evidence for these expenses. The AO and CIT(A) did not allow these expenses, and the Tribunal upheld this decision. The grounds were dismissed.Issue 4: Addition of Unexplained Share Capital, Share Premium, and Current LiabilitiesThe AO added Rs. 21,63,49,889/- as unexplained cash credits due to the assessee's failure to explain the sources of accretion. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, and the Tribunal found no infirmity in the order. The grounds were dismissed.Issue 5: Rebate on Liability Created by SEBIThe assessee claimed a rebate on account of liability created by SEBI amounting to Rs. 15,09,72,412/-, which was added back by the AO. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, and the Tribunal found no infirmity in the order. The ground was dismissed.Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed all the appeals of the assessee, upholding the decisions of the AO and CIT(A) on all grounds. The order pronounced in the open court on 15.03.2023.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
