Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was a new industrial unit that had commenced commercial production on or before 31.03.2017 so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 20/2007-CE dated 25.04.2007.
Analysis: The documentary record showed procurement of machinery and raw materials from 2016 onwards, installation of machinery before 31.03.2017, intimation to the Department on 31.03.2017, issuance of a certificate of commercial production by the Department of Industries, payment of duty on initial clearances, and filing of ER-1 returns reflecting production and clearance. The absence of evidence regarding one input was not treated as sufficient to dislodge the contemporaneous documents. The fact that the unit functioned in the same and had common partners with the earlier concern was held not, by itself, to negate the status of a new industrial unit where the evidence established fresh establishment and commencement of production within the notified period.
Conclusion: The appellant was held eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 20/2007-CE dated 25.04.2007.
Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility to a time-bound exemption for a new industrial unit depends on credible evidence of fresh establishment and commencement of commercial production within the notified period, and it cannot be denied merely because the unit shares premises or personnel with an earlier concern.