Assessee wins appeal against Assessing Officer's profit estimation without book rejection.

The appeals filed by the assessee against the additions made by the Assessing Officer without rejecting the books of accounts were allowed for the Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2016-17. The Appellate Tribunal held that estimating profits without book rejection was impermissible under the law. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper procedure and disallowance of expenditures without documentary evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee for all the assessment years in question.

---

---

Issues:
The judgment involves appeals filed by the assessee against the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2016-17, concerning additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) without rejecting the books of accounts under section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Summary:
The assessee, a partnership firm, filed its return of income for the relevant years. Following a survey operation, the AO made additions for unexplained cash credits and estimated income without rejecting the books of accounts. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, deleting the cash credit addition but confirming the income estimation. The assessee then appealed to the Tribunal, challenging the estimation of profits without book rejection.

The Appellate Tribunal noted that the AO's estimation without book rejection was not permissible under the law, citing decisions by various High Courts. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO should have disallowed expenditures for which no documentary evidence was provided, rather than estimating profits. As the AO failed to follow proper procedure, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal for all the assessment years.

In conclusion, the appeals filed by the assessee were allowed for the Assessment Years 2013-14 to 2016-17, as the estimation of profits without rejecting the books of accounts was deemed invalid by the Tribunal.

---