Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in proceedings under Section 10-B of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, the revisional authority could rely upon material not available on the record at the time of the original assessment.
Analysis: The revisional power under Section 10-B is confined to examining the legality and propriety of the original assessment on the basis of material then available on the assessing authority's record. The subsequent invoices and other material relied upon for reopening were not on record when the first assessment order was passed, and therefore could not form the basis of revisional interference or reassessment. The Tribunal's view that no material existed at the time of the original assessment to show that development charges had been recovered from customers was consistent with the settled legal position.
Conclusion: The revisional authority could not rely on subsequent material, and the Tribunal's order was in law.
Final Conclusion: The revision was rejected because the reassessment and revisional action under Section 10-B could not rest on material extraneous to the original assessment record.
Ratio Decidendi: Revisional power under Section 10-B of the U.P. Sales Tax Act must be exercised only on the basis of the material available before the assessing authority at the time of the original assessment, and subsequent information cannot be used to reopen the assessment.