Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, being governed by section 5A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was entitled to claim full TDS credit in his own hands or whether the TDS credit had to be apportioned between the spouses.
Analysis: Section 5A is a special provision applicable to spouses governed by the Portuguese Civil Code and it requires apportionment of income between them. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that the remaining provisions of the Act apply accordingly, that amounts deducted at source are deemed to be income received under section 198, and that the expression "assessee" must be read in the context of both spouses covered by section 5A. Rule 37BA(2) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, read with its proviso, was also relied upon to hold that the deductee was required to furnish the necessary declaration where the income is assessable in another person's hands.
Conclusion: The claim for full TDS credit in the assessee's hands was rejected and the TDS credit was held to be consequentially apportionable; the issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.