Tribunal rules Dish TV not a retail consumer, sets aside assessment under wrong Act

The Tribunal concluded that the assessment should be done under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, not Section 4A, as Dish TV is an institutional consumer, and the sale to Dish TV does not constitute a retail sale. Consequently, the price of Rs. 2,100/- cannot be considered the RSP. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Applicability of Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act for assessing additional duty of customs.
2. Determination of Retail Sale Price (RSP) for set top boxes.
3. Demand of interest and imposition of penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Applicability of Section 4 or Section 4A of the Central Excise Act:

The appellant contested the assessment under Section 4A, arguing that the set top boxes (STBs) should be assessed under Section 4, as per the Tribunal's decision in Bharti Telemedia Ltd. and the CBEC circular dated 11 March 2016. The Tribunal in Bharti Telemedia Ltd. held that STBs used by ultimate consumers do not involve retail sale, thus Section 4A does not apply. The CBEC circular clarified that this judgment should be followed for identical circumstances. The appellant argued that Dish TV, being an institutional consumer, does not qualify as a retail buyer, and thus the SWM Rules and Section 4A do not apply.

2. Determination of Retail Sale Price (RSP):

The assessing officer initially rejected the declared RSP of Rs. 1,000/- per piece, recalculating it to Rs. 1,832/- and, after abatement, determined the duty based on Rs. 1,465/- per piece. The appellant later sold the STBs to Dish TV at Rs. 2,100/- per piece. The Revenue argued that Rs. 2,100/- should be considered the RSP. The Tribunal found that Dish TV, being an institutional consumer, does not constitute a retail sale. The Tribunal noted that the price at which STBs were sold to Dish TV cannot be considered as the RSP since Dish TV used the STBs to provide services rather than selling them to ultimate consumers.

3. Demand of Interest and Imposition of Penalty:

The Tribunal did not specifically address the demand of interest and the imposition of penalty under Section 112 in detail, as the primary focus was on the applicability of Section 4A and the determination of RSP. However, by setting aside the impugned order, the Tribunal implicitly negated the basis for interest and penalty.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the assessment should be done under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, not Section 4A, as Dish TV is an institutional consumer, and the sale to Dish TV does not constitute a retail sale. Consequently, the price of Rs. 2,100/- cannot be considered the RSP. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.

---