Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of a written agreement and receipt of consideration, the handing over of possession to a developer amounted to a transfer within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, so as to attract capital gains in the relevant block period.
Analysis: Section 2(47)(v) applies only when the transaction satisfies the ingredients of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. A prerequisite for section 53A is a contract to transfer immovable property by writing signed by the transferor or on his behalf, from which the terms can be ascertained with reasonable certainty. The record showed that there was no written agreement between the assessee and the builder and no sale consideration had been received during the relevant period. In the absence of these foundational requirements, the developer's occupation could not be treated as possession in part performance of a contract falling within section 53A.
Conclusion: The transaction did not constitute a transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and no capital gains were assessable in the block period.
Final Conclusion: The addition made on the basis of an alleged transfer to the developer was unsustainable, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 2(47)(v) is attracted only where the transaction independently satisfies the statutory requirements of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, including a written contract and possession in part performance.