We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Public corporation activities mostly exempt from GST under Notification 14/2017-CT(Rate) with reverse charge on specific items The AAAR Tamil Nadu rectified errors in a GST ruling concerning transactions between a public corporation and contractors. Most activities (items 1-9, 13 ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Public corporation activities mostly exempt from GST under Notification 14/2017-CT(Rate) with reverse charge on specific items
The AAAR Tamil Nadu rectified errors in a GST ruling concerning transactions between a public corporation and contractors. Most activities (items 1-9, 13 excluding specific charges for TV advertisements, flower shops, and bunk stalls) were held exempt under Notification 14/2017-CT(Rate) as public authority activities. Avenue receipts and fishing rights (items 10-11) were subject to reverse charge mechanism under registered tenderers per Notification 13/2017-CT(Rate). Fish market operations (item 12) qualified for exemption under Notification 12/2017-CT(Rate) with optional reverse charge mechanism application.
Issues Involved: 1. Rectification of the ruling for activities listed in Sl. No. 10, 11, and 12. 2. Classification and exemption applicability for activities at Sl. No. 5A, 5C, and 7. 3. Correct jurisdictional authority.
Detailed Analysis:
Issue 1: Rectification of the Ruling for Activities Listed in Sl. No. 10, 11, and 12 The appellant sought rectification for the ruling concerning activities at Sl. No. 10 (Avenue receipts), 11 (Right to fishing in pond), and 12 (Running a fish market), which were omitted in the original order. The appellant requested clarification on whether these services were covered under the Twelfth Schedule to Article 243 W of the Constitution and/or exempted via relevant notifications.
Upon review, the appellate authority found that these activities were entirely undertaken through contractors by tender process. The appellant did not specifically seek the applicability of Notification No. 14/2017-C.T.(Rate) but claimed the activities were covered under Article 243 G and 243 W of the Constitution. The authority concluded that the activities were for the "enjoyment of rights" rather than "giving of services," and thus, Notification No. 14/2017-C.T.(Rate) would not apply.
For Avenue receipts and Right to fishing in pond, the authority determined that these activities fall under the definition of "renting of immovable property" and are subject to reverse charge by the tenderer as per Sl. No. 5A of Notification No. 13/2017-CT(Rate). The exemption entries in Notification No. 12/2017-CT(Rate) and Notification No. 11/2017-CT(Rate) were found inapplicable.
For Running a fish market, the activity was classified as "right to Renting of Immovable Property" and was eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 7 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(Rate) and subject to tax on RCM basis under Sl. No. 5 of Notification No. 13/2017-CT(R).
Issue 2: Classification and Exemption Applicability for Activities at Sl. No. 5A, 5C, and 7 The appellant contended that the activities at Sl. No. 5A (Charges for TV advertisement in bus stand), 5C (Flower shop in bus stand), and 7 (Bunk stall in bus stand) were incorrectly classified under "renting of immovable property services" and should be rectified.
The appellate authority reviewed the classification and found that the activities were correctly classified under "renting of immovable property services" as per para 9.2 of the appellate order. The authority held that these activities were covered under Sl. No. 7 of Notification 12/2017-CT(Rate) and subject to tax on RCM basis as per Sl. No. 5 of Notification No. 13/2017-CT(R). Therefore, the request for rectification was rejected as there was no error apparent on the face of the record.
Issue 3: Correct Jurisdictional Authority The appellant pointed out that the jurisdiction was incorrectly mentioned as Coimbatore Commissionerate in the original order, whereas it should be Salem Commissionerate, Erode Division. The appellate authority acknowledged this error and rectified the jurisdictional authority to Salem Commissionerate, Erode Division.
Final Ruling on Rectification of Error: - Rectified Ruling for Activities at Sl. No. 10 and 11: The supply of services conferring enjoyment of rights is liable to reverse charge by the tenderer registered under the CGST/TNGST Act as per Sl. No. 5A of Notification No. 13/2017-CT(Rate). - Rectified Ruling for Activity at Sl. No. 12: Exemption under Sl. No. 7 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(Rate) and tax on RCM basis under Sl. No. 5 of Notification No. 13/2017-CT(R) is available subject to conditions. - No Amendment for Activities at Sl. No. 5A, 5C, and 7: The request for rectification was rejected. - Corrected Jurisdictional Authority: Salem Commissionerate, Erode Division.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.