Invalid reassessment under sections 147/148; 153C should apply when documents relate to a different entity.

The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148 instead of section 153C were invalid. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal found that when documents pertaining to a different entity are discovered during a search, section 153C should be invoked. The reassessment order was deemed null and void, leading to the quashing of the reassessment order. Other grounds raised by the assessee were not addressed as a result. The appeal was partly allowed, with the order pronounced on 23.03.2023.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148 instead of section 153C.
2. Applicability of precedents from similar cases.

Summary:

Validity of Reassessment Proceedings:
The primary issue was whether the Assessing Officer (AO) should have invoked the provisions of section 153C instead of sections 147/148 for reassessment. The assessee argued that the reassessment proceedings initiated under sections 147/148 were invalid because they were based on material found during a search operation on another entity, which should have triggered section 153C. The Tribunal agreed, citing the ITAT Pune Bench's decision in Vikram Munishwarlal Bajaj vs. ITO, which held that when documents belonging to a person other than the one searched are found, the AO must proceed under section 153C. The Tribunal found that the reassessment order dated 11.03.2013 was null and void.

Applicability of Precedents:
The Tribunal noted that the identical issue had been adjudicated in favor of the assessee in the case of V.L. Khandge and others, where it was held that proceedings should be initiated under section 153C when documents related to another person are found during a search. The Tribunal also referenced the case of Joshi Wadewale Hadapsar Vs. DCIT, which supported the same principle. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's reliance on the ITAT Delhi Bench decision in M/s. Mannat Hospitality (P) Ltd. vs. ITO, noting that the facts of that case were dissimilar.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment order passed under sections 147/148 was not valid and sustainable, thus quashing the reassessment order. Consequently, other grounds raised by the assessee on merits were deemed academic and not adjudicated.

Order:
The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, with the reassessment order being quashed. The order was pronounced in the open court on 23.03.2023.

---