Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additional customs duty was leviable on a vessel imported for breaking up when the corresponding article under the excise tariff attracted nil duty by virtue of the exemption notification.
Analysis: The Court relied on the exemption granted by Notification No. 167/86-C.E. for goods falling under Chapter 89 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, read with Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Tariff Heading 89.08 covered vessels for breaking up, and the language of the excise and customs tariff headings was identical. Under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, additional duty is levied at a rate equal to the excise duty for the time being leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India. Since the excise duty on the relevant tariff item was nil, the corresponding additional duty on the imported vessel had to be nil as well.
Conclusion: Additional duty was not leviable beyond the duty payable on the basis of Notification No. 74/93-Cus., and the assessment imposing additional customs duty was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the assessment was quashed to the extent of the additional duty demand, leaving the petitioners liable only to the duty worked out under the applicable customs notification.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the excise duty on a like article is nil by reason of a valid exemption, the additional duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 must also be nil.