Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Revenue challenged the decision of the CIT(A) regarding the cost of acquisition of debentures issued by NTPC in lieu of dividends. The assessee argued that the dividend receivable, which was subjected to Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT), was reinvested in debentures and should be considered the cost of acquisition. The AO denied this, citing Section 55(2)(aa)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act, which states that the cost should be taken as "Nil" for financial assets allotted without any payment. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision in the case of J.P. Morgan Funds vs. DCIT, where it was held that the amount reinvested in debentures from dividends should be considered the cost of acquisition. The CIT(A) relied on this decision, and the Tribunal found no infirmity in this approach, dismissing the Revenue's grounds on this issue.
Issue 2: Set-off of Short-Term Capital Losses Against Gains Taxable at Different RatesDuring the financial year under consideration, the assessee incurred a net short-term capital loss of Rs. 98,24,23,558/-. The assessee set off this loss first against short-term capital gains taxable at 30% and then against gains taxable at 15%. The AO rejected this method, bringing the gains taxable at 30% to tax. The CIT(A) relied on the Special Bench decision in Montgomery Emerging Markets Fund and accepted the assessee's method. The Tribunal upheld this decision, stating that the computation of short-term capital gains is similar irrespective of the tax rate. The Tribunal referenced the Special Bench judgment and subsequent decisions, which support the view that losses can be set off against gains within the same head of income, regardless of the tax rate. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's grounds on this issue as well.
Conclusion:The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on all grounds, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions regarding the cost of acquisition for debentures and the set-off of short-term capital losses.
Order pronounced on 21/03/2023 by way of proper mentioning in the notice board.