Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dispute on taxation of receipts from distance education / database access as royalty under the Income-tax Act and the India-Malaysia DTAA required remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The assessment and DRP orders proceeded on the basis that the receipts were royalty, but the record showed that several agreements and supporting documents were filed in pieces and were not thoroughly verified. The additional material was also sought to be admitted and the Revenue requested that the matter be sent back for verification. In view of the lack of complete factual examination, the comparable remand in the assessee's earlier year, and the need to consider the issue alongside the earlier year in the light of the governing treaty principles, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed only to the extent of setting aside the impugned finding for reconsideration, with the substantive taxability question left open.