Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a director accused in an FIR alleging offences under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the Indian Penal Code.
Analysis: The application was considered in the context of allegations of tax evasion against the company and the director's role in its affairs. The Court noted the absence of specific provisions fastening liability on directors in the manner alleged, the continued protection already operating in the applicant's favour, and the fact that co-accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. On these facts, the Court found it fit to extend anticipatory bail, while preserving the investigating agency's right to seek police remand in accordance with law.
Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant.