TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Transportation charges deemed part of taxable turnover under Kerala VAT Act</h1> <h3>Kerala State Electricity Board Versus Authority For Clarification (Under Section 94 Of Kvat Taxes), Office Of The Commissioner Commercial Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram</h3> Kerala State Electricity Board Versus Authority For Clarification (Under Section 94 Of Kvat Taxes), Office Of The Commissioner Commercial Taxes, ... Issues:1. Interpretation of taxable turnover under Section 94 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.2. Applicability of Rule 10(e) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules in determining taxable turnover.3. Whether charges for transportation, loading, unloading, and stacking form part of the taxable turnover in a contract for the supply of goods.Issue 1: Interpretation of Taxable TurnoverThe Kerala State Electricity Board challenged an order under Section 94 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, regarding the inclusion of charges for loading, unloading, stacking, and transportation in the taxable turnover of a contract for the supply of electrical poles. The Board argued that the sale was complete at the factory gate, and the transportation charges were not part of the sale consideration. However, the court found that clauses in the purchase order indicated that the cost of transportation was included in the sale price, and the sale was not complete at the factory gate. The court referred to relevant legal precedents to support its conclusion that charges included in the price, even if shown separately, are part of the sale price for tax purposes.Issue 2: Applicability of Rule 10(e) of the Kerala Value Added Tax RulesThe appellant contended that Rule 10(e) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Rules should exclude charges for freight and delivery from the taxable turnover since they were separately shown in the invoices. However, the court held that Rule 10(e) only excludes amounts charged separately without including them in the price of goods sold. In this case, the court determined that the freight and transportation charges were part of the sale consideration and could not be excluded under Rule 10(e), as they were incidental to the sale.Issue 3: Inclusion of Charges in Taxable TurnoverThe court analyzed the definitions of sale price, total turnover, and taxable turnover under the KVAT Act to determine whether charges for transportation, loading, unloading, and delivery were included in the sale price. The court found that the terms of the contract, along with legal principles and precedents, established that these charges were part of the sale consideration. The court emphasized that all charges incurred until the passing of title to the goods should be included in the sale consideration for tax purposes, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the order of clarification under Section 94 of the KVAT Act.In conclusion, the High Court of Kerala upheld the order of clarification, ruling that charges for transportation, loading, unloading, and stacking were integral components of the sale price and formed part of the taxable turnover in the contract for the supply of electrical poles. The court's detailed analysis of the legal provisions, contractual clauses, and precedents supported the decision to dismiss the appeal.
TaxTMI 