Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        2023 (3) TMI 450 - HC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        IBC Section 7 Constitutionality Upheld: Court Dismisses Writ Petition, Affirms Authority's Discretion The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, dismissing the writ petition challenging its ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          IBC Section 7 Constitutionality Upheld: Court Dismisses Writ Petition, Affirms Authority's Discretion

                          The court upheld the constitutionality of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, dismissing the writ petition challenging its validity. It affirmed the adjudicating authority's discretion under Section 7(5)(a) to consider all relevant aspects before admitting an application. The court referenced previous judgments supporting the validity of IBC provisions and emphasized the legislative intent to revive corporate debtors. The petitioner was directed to file objections before the adjudicating authority, which must consider them on merits.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Constitutionality of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
                          2. Maintainability of the writ petition challenging the validity of Section 7 of IBC.
                          3. Discretion of the adjudicating authority under Section 7 of IBC.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Constitutionality of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016:
                          The petitioner challenged the constitutionality of Section 7 of IBC, claiming it violates Article 14 of the Constitution by not allowing the adjudicating authority any discretion in adjudicating applications filed by financial creditors. The petitioner argued that Section 7 discriminates between financial creditors and operational creditors, with the former being able to initiate insolvency proceedings more easily. The court, however, upheld the constitutionality of Section 7, referencing precedents such as Innoventive Industries Ltd v. ICICI Bank and Swiss Ribbons (P) Ltd v. Union of India, which affirmed the validity of IBC provisions. The court emphasized that the legislative intent behind IBC is to ensure the revival and continuation of the corporate debtor and that the adjudicating authority does have discretion under Section 7(5)(a) to consider all relevant aspects before admitting an application.

                          2. Maintainability of the Writ Petition:
                          The respondent argued that the writ petition challenging Section 7's validity should not be entertained, citing the Supreme Court's order in Shivam Water Treaters Pvt Ltd v. Union of India, which discouraged High Courts from debating the validity of IBC. The petitioner contended that the specific challenge in this case was not covered by the Supreme Court's order. The court noted that the presumption of constitutionality applies to legislative enactments and that any challenge must show a clear transgression of constitutional principles. The court concluded that the challenge to Section 7's constitutionality was without merit, referencing the comprehensive judgments in Innoventive Industries Ltd and Swiss Ribbons (P) Ltd, which had already addressed and upheld the constitutional validity of IBC provisions.

                          3. Discretion of the Adjudicating Authority under Section 7 of IBC:
                          The petitioner argued that Section 7 does not provide the adjudicating authority with discretion to consider the unique circumstances of each case, making the process mechanical. The court, however, clarified that Section 7(5)(a) does confer discretion on the adjudicating authority to decide whether to admit an application after considering all relevant aspects. The court referenced several judgments, including Swiss Ribbons (P) Ltd and Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd v. Axis Bank, which highlighted that the adjudicating authority must consider the overall financial health and viability of the corporate debtor before admitting an application. The court concluded that Section 7 is not a draconian provision and that the adjudicating authority is legally bound to consider all relevant aspects, including objections raised by the corporate debtor, before making a decision.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the constitutionality of Section 7 of IBC and affirming the discretion of the adjudicating authority under the provision. The petitioner was directed to file objections against the application before the adjudicating authority, which is bound to consider them on merits.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found